![]() ![]() Either can be configured with up to 8TB of internal storage, though doing this costs over $2,000 for either configuration, and you might be better off researching external Thunderbolt SSD enclosures if you're looking for a ton of space. The M2 Max has between 32GB and 96GB of RAM, and the M2 Ultra comes with between 64GB and 192GB neither is upgradeable after purchase, per usual for Apple Silicon systems. The two ports on the front of the M2 Max Mac Studio are 10Gbps USB-C ports, while the two on the M2 Ultra are full 40Gbps Thunderbolt ports. Performance doesn't exactly double, but we'll talk about that more later.Īside from the chips, there are a few other notable distinctions between the two systems. That makes sense since, architecturally, the M2 Ultra is just two M2 Max chips fused together with a silicon interposer that lets them communicate at rates of up to 2.5TB per second. The new Mac StudioĮverything about the M2 Ultra version of the Studio is exactly double what you get with the M2 Max: double the CPU cores, double the GPU cores, double the RAM, and double the price. There's also a bit of awkward pricing overlap with the high-end M2 Pro Mac mini that didn't exist last year.īut for the vast majority of people who prefer to do their photo and video editing, 3D rendering, app development, and other heavy-duty work on Apple's desktops, the Mac Studio is still the one to beat. There is probably still a tiny audience for the redesigned Mac Pro, people who still use macOS and still use internal PCI Express expansion cards that aren't GPUs it should also be relatively easy to add gobs of cheap, fast internal storage, a kind of upgrade the Mac Studio is still frustratingly incapable of. That's partly because the new Studio is even faster than the old one-Apple sent us a fully enabled M2 Ultra model with 128GB of RAM-and partly because Apple Silicon Macs are designed in ways that make Mac Pro-style expandability and modularity impossible. Though it was more like a supercharged Mac mini than a downsized Mac Pro, its M1 Max and M1 Ultra processors were fantastic performers, and they were much more energy-efficient than the one in the most recent Intel Mac Pro, too.Īpple is releasing the M2 version of the Mac Studio this week, and even though it's being launched alongside a brand-new Mac Pro, it still might be Apple's most compelling professional desktop. The original Mac Studio, despite the absence of "Pro" in the name, was Apple's most compelling professional desktop release in years. ![]() Further Reading Review: The Mac Studio shows us exactly why Apple left Intel behind ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |